Article 10: Review, Revision, and Appeal – Differences Explained under Pakistani Law

S.M. ZULKUFIL HAIDER & CO.
Advocates & Barristers-at-law
www.zulkufilhaiderandco.com


Review, Revision, and Appeal – Differences Explained under Pakistani Law

Once a court decision is passed, there are several legal remedies available to an aggrieved party, such as appeal, review, and revision. While all are post-judgment remedies, they are distinct in purpose, scope, and jurisdiction.

This article explains the key differences between these three legal remedies under Pakistani civil and criminal law.


⚖️ 1. Appeal


🔹 Definition:

An appeal is a statutory right allowing a party to challenge the judgment or decree of a lower court in a higher court.


🔹 Purpose:

To request a complete re-hearing of the case — both factual and legal issues.


🔹 Key Features:

Filed as of right (if provided by law)

Both facts and law may be questioned

The entire judgment is under review

New evidence may be allowed in rare cases


🔹 Applicable Law:

Civil matters: Section 96 & 100 CPC

Criminal matters: Sections 410–423 CrPC


🔹 Limitation:

30 to 90 days, depending on the forum and type of case


⚖️ 2. Review


🔹 Definition:

A review petition is filed before the same court that delivered the judgment, asking it to reconsider its decision.


🔹 Purpose:

To correct an error apparent on the face of the record, or when new evidence becomes available that could not be produced earlier.


🔹 Key Features:

No rehearing — limited to review of legal error

Same court revisits its own judgment

Not a substitute for appeal


🔹 Applicable Law:

Civil: Section 114 CPC, Order XLVII

Criminal: In limited cases, available through High Court practice


🔹 Grounds for Review:

Discovery of new and important matter or evidence

Error apparent on the face of the record

Any other sufficient reason


🔹 Limitation:

Within 30 days of the judgment/order


⚖️ 3. Revision


🔹 Definition:

A revision petition is filed in a higher court to correct jurisdictional errors or legal irregularities committed by a subordinate court.


🔹 Purpose:

To supervise judicial discipline without disturbing the merits of the entire case unless gross injustice is apparent.


🔹 Key Features:

Discretionary remedy

Typically no new evidence allowed

Only legal questions or jurisdictional errors considered

Can be filed even when no appeal is provided


🔹 Applicable Law:

Civil: Section 115 CPC

Criminal: Section 435–439 CrPC


🔹 When to Use Revision:

When a subordinate court acted without jurisdiction, or

Committed a material irregularity affecting the case


✅ Summary Table

Feature Appeal Review Revision

Filed Before Higher Court Same Court Higher Court


Scope Entire case (facts & law) Only errors in judgment Legal/jurisdictional errors


New Evidence Sometimes allowed Rare Not allowed



Limitation Varies by forum


Disclaimer: This article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal assistance specific to your situation, please consult a qualified lawyer at S.M. Zulkufil Haider & Co.


S.M. ZULKUFIL HAIDER & CO.
www.zulkufilhaiderandco.com

Leave a Reply